We’ll call it the “Calamari 5000”
(worker in blood-stained apron to coworkers) I’m as dedicated to the squid-gutting business as anyone. But the writing’s on the wall, and it’s time we came out with a line of netbooks.
(worker in blood-stained apron to coworkers) I’m as dedicated to the squid-gutting business as anyone. But the writing’s on the wall, and it’s time we came out with a line of netbooks.
Do you know who’s looking at your Facebook photos?
A lot of people don’t know that Facebook’s default privacy settings expose their photos to the world. And for a stranger, browsing your snapshots of that crazy drunken office party may be as simple as installing a new Facebook application called Photo Stalker.
That’s the word from Vancouver Sun reporter Gillian Shaw, who interviewed the app’s developer.
Carcione said he developed the software because there was no other way to pull up photos that are posted with “everyone” as their privacy setting, and he also saw it as a way to generate revenue from ads on the application site.
“That’s what people go on Facebook for, to look at pictures of their exes,” he said. “They are going to be able to spy on people, which they weren’t able to do before.
“People are just curious, stalkers, I don’t know. The name is perfect, only stalkers would want to do that.”
She also interviewed me… after having a stroll through my Facebook photo library. (I’m cool with that – there’s nothing embarrassing on there, and we know each other, although we weren’t Facebook friends at the time.)
Cottingham’s online photo album was among ones I perused with Photo Stalker. I also randomly punched in Facebook ID numbers and saw a number of photo albums for users showing everything from personal pictures from the U.S. presidential inauguration to photos from Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz’s Harvard sophomore year dorm, various vacations, living quarters, parties and other events through recent years.
Cottingham said that while “strictly speaking” Photo Stalker doesn’t violate Facebook’s terms of service, he said it is unlikely people posting photos on their profile sites will expect them to be found by a Facebook application.
“Is this going to come as a pretty rude surprise to them?” he asked. “To the extent that you are taking advantage of people’s naivete or carelessness or just lack of understanding how a platform works, I think you really have to ask yourself what it is you are doing and why you are doing it.”
So if you do have pictures on Facebook of yourself, say, running around with fairy wings and a wand when you were supposedly off work sick, now might be a good time to rethink your privacy settings. If you’re logged into Facebook, click here… or just navigate as follows:
Not every story fits in a few neat paragraphs – especially stories that are still unfolding. Maybe you’re taking on a major advocacy project. Adding a green roof to your office building. Or tracking an intern’s apprenticeship in the skills and culture of your industry.
Either way, you have a story that can engage readers over an extended period: weeks, months or even years. And when it’s a story that reinforces your brand and engages readers, you have something with the potential for real value… if you can tell it to them.
But telling that story through traditional channels can be difficult. Advertising is expensive, and it’s a major commitment to devote an extended ad buy to one story; news media, while they may cover you from time to time, almost certainly won’t broadcast every development – and there’s no guarantee they won’t lost interest.
A blog, on the other hand, lets you tell an extended story easily. Devoted readers can follow every development via RSS; others can check in from time to time. And if your story is a compelling one, you can build an audience over time – people joining you halfway through can experience it from the beginning, thanks to your blog’s archives.
Commenting allows readers to become part of the story, whether it’s by cheering from the sidelines, as active participants with offers of help and support, or as story-tellers in their own right, inspired by your tale. That’s the kind of engagement traditional media can’t offer.
Here’s how to put extended story-telling to work on behalf of your organization and your brand:
And here are three ways to tell when your storytelling is building toward a happy ending for you and your organization:

Some blog comments are easy to deal with. They praise you to the heavens, share a related story or gently offer a different perspective… that is, they’re a positive part of the conversation. You thank, you respond (or they’re comment spam, in which case you report them to Mollom or Akismet and then delete) and the circle of life continues.
But other comments are hard. They get your back up. They seem to question not just your argument but your integrity. The more you read them, the clearer it becomes that they were written by evil, evil people. And with your fight-or-flight mechanism firmly in gear, you write a blistering reply…
…Maybe there’s a better way. Negotiation ninja and friend of the show David Eaves knows a lot about understanding and resolving conflict. And he brought that insight to bear on the thorny issue of online commenting in a presentation in February at a Northern Voice panel. (Jessi covered the panel here.)
David has lots of great advice and insight to offer, such as this:
[A] key lesson that came to me while developing the presentation is that most blogs, social media projects, and online projects in general, really need a social contract – or as Skirky describes it, a bargain – that the organizer and the community agree to. Often such contracts (or bargains) are strongly implied, but I believe it is occasionally helpful to make them explicit – particularly on blogs or projects that deal with contentious (politics) or complicated (many open source projects) issues.
(I’ve resisted the urge to leave a venomous comment on his blog post just to see how he handles it.)
If you missed his presentation, here’s your chance to glean a little of David’s thinking on the subject: he’s posted it to Slideshare.
Enjoy. And by all means, comment.
Dealing with Difficult Blog Comments
View more presentations from David Eaves.

Some blog comments are easy to deal with. They praise you to the heavens, share a related story or gently offer a different perspective… that is, they’re a positive part of the conversation. You thank, you respond (or they’re comment spam, in which case you report them to Mollom or Akismet and then delete) and the circle of life continues.
But other comments are hard. They get your back up. They seem to question not just your argument but your integrity. The more you read them, the clearer it becomes that they were written by evil, evil people. And with your fight-or-flight mechanism firmly in gear, you write a blistering reply…
…Maybe there’s a better way. Negotiation ninja and friend of the show David Eaves knows a lot about understanding and resolving conflict. And he brought that insight to bear on the thorny issue of online commenting in a presentation in February at a Northern Voice panel. (Jessi covered the panel here.)
David has lots of great advice and insight to offer, such as this:
[A] key lesson that came to me while developing the presentation is that most blogs, social media projects, and online projects in general, really need a social contract – or as Skirky describes it, a bargain – that the organizer and the community agree to. Often such contracts (or bargains) are strongly implied, but I believe it is occasionally helpful to make them explicit – particularly on blogs or projects that deal with contentious (politics) or complicated (many open source projects) issues.
(I’ve resisted the urge to leave a venomous comment on his blog post just to see how he handles it.)
If you missed his presentation, here’s your chance to glean a little of David’s thinking on the subject: he’s posted it to Slideshare.
Enjoy. And by all means, comment.
Dealing with Difficult Blog Comments
View more presentations from David Eaves.
